
Since he last received the endorsement of both major parties in 2014, Ulster County Sheriff Paul VanBlarcum has appeared in a photograph in the oval office with President Donald Trump, instituted a short-lived policy that checked all visitors to the Department of Social Services for warrants, called on permitted gun owners to carry in public after a mass shooting and urged a boycott of the NFL because he felt players kneeling during the national anthem was disrespectful.
In other words, the 62-year-old sheriff, first elected in 2007, seemed, to many in his party, to be acting more like a Republican than a Democrat. A challenge from the progressive wing of the party soon followed. His opponent, Juan Figueora, a 53-year-old former state trooper and U.S. Marine from Plattekill, trounced him with 85 percent of the vote at the party’s May nominating convention. The sheriff, hoping the 40,000-plus registered Democrats in the county (or at least the 20 percent or so likely to vote in a primary) will have a different opinion than the 300 who voted at the convention. VanBlarcum and Figueroa will face off for the Democratic nomination in the primary on Thursday, Sept. 13. Polls are open from noon to 9 p.m. Regardless of what happens next week, VanBlarcum will appear on the general election ballot, having previously secured nods from the Republican and Independence parties. VanBlarcum said he knew he’d face a challenge when he met with the party’s executive committee prior to the May nominating convention. “They didn’t have one complaint about the day-to-day operations of the sheriff’s office,” said VanBlarcum. “You know why they’re not supporting me this year? Their number-one reason? It’s because I met with President Trump.” The occasion was Police Week in May of 2017, an event that pays tribute to law enforcement personnel who died in the line of duty. Kerry Winters, an Ulster County corrections officer, died during a dive team training exercise the previous September. “I don’t care who the president is,” said VanBlarcum. “If they’re honoring one of our people, I’m going down there.” He said we should ask his opponent if he would have declined to meet with the president under similar circumstances. “If he says no, he wouldn’t have gone there, then I’d be really, severely disappointed in him.” Would he? “In today’s world, [with the] divisiveness of what’s going on in our country today, I would probably tell you that I would not go to the Oval Office,” said Figueroa. “If there was another president then obviously that would be different. But I would not have, no.” Hector Rodriguez, minority leader of the Ulster County Legislature, says the party’s issues with the sheriff go well beyond a photo op. “The picture is fairly meaningless,” the New Paltz Democrat said. “It’s all these other pieces that sort of fall into this. You can’t continue to do this stuff and then claim to be a Democrat.”
The job
The Ulster County Sheriff’s Department is one of the oldest in that nation, established in 1661. The word “sheriff” dates back to Middle English, a combination of “shire” (a county) and “reeve” (a local official charged with enforcement of specific regulations). In newly settled areas, the sheriff was one of the first positions that needed to be filled — a signifier of civilization. Today, patrolling rural areas with limited or no local police is still a major part of the job. The sheriff is one of a handful of county-wide elected positions, including county executive, county clerk, district attorney and comptroller. While town and city police chiefs are appointed by the town board or city council, and the state police have a chain of command than runs up to the superintendent, nominated by the governor and confirmed by the state Senate, the sheriff is chosen by the voters of a county every four years. Though candidates are usually drawn from the ranks of law enforcement, no credentials, experience or training are required. Candidates simply need to be county residents, 18 years of age.
The candidates


The issues
DSS warrant checks In October 2014, the sheriff’s office began checking all visitors to the county’s Department of Social Services for outstanding warrants. The policy was criticized by the ACLU, state attorney general and local Democratic county legislators as discriminatory because it was seen as targeting the poor. It was discontinued after county legislators threatened to privatize security at the building. The sheriff stands by the policy, which he says was instituted both to catch those with outstanding warrants and protect DSS workers. He said checks are also done at the jail and probation department. He added that eight months after the policy was discontinued, he finally had a meeting with then-Attorney General Eric Schneiderman. After he explained exactly how the warrant checks were being done, the sheriff said the attorney general raised no objections. Figueroa says the policy was a violation of the fourth amendment’s protection against illegal search and seizure because the warrant checks lacked probable cause. “What he did there was to take on the underprivileged that we have in our community,” said Figueroa. “The poor people who aren’t going to say anything because they’re there to get help. He wouldn’t do that at the Department of Motor Vehicles I’m sure. He wouldn’t stop people on State Route 28 [to check for warrants].” We asked VanBlarcum if he would. “I wanted to do it at the county building [where the DMV is located],” he said. “Unfortunately, the people in charge, meaning the executive, do not want that done.” If the sheriff got his way, he said, those presenting their ID for any of the various transactions at the DMV would be screened for warrants, and the clerk could walk out into the hallway and alert one of the deputies. As for setting up a roadblock on Route 28, VanBlarcum said police often set up DWI checkpoints on major roads.

Only a fraction of the content from each issue of Woodstock Times is available to read online for free. To get it all, you'll need to subscribe. Learn more.
I met Juan in Saugerties and stopped to ask him a few questions about how he would address the issue of opioid abuse. His response was tough, creative and, compassionate — go after the companies flooding our market, help parents and teachers identify problems early on and, offer treatment over incarceration. Good ideas and, more to the point, he has a real-time plan for making these changes happen. At the end of our conversation, I was thinking, wow, what a nice guy. Later when I checked out his work history, I was awed. This nice guy has stood up to some seriously bad dudes and, he put them behind bars! He’s done enough in his life already to make this county proud to call him our own. Let’s not miss the chance to make him Sheriff! Vote this Thursday, 9/13/18!
Van Blarcum is a no brainier. The man does an excellent job. He runs the county the way it should be run. Checking people going to DSS for checks who may have a warrant, or telling people to turn off the NFL games on Veterans Day because some athletes are disrespecting the flag does not warrant losing your job. Do you know how well the Sheriff’s Department runs under Van Blarcum? Just ask one of the Sheriff’s employees. Well over 99% will say they are voting for Van Blarcum, 99%! Just ask one of them. That alone says a lot about how this man runs the Sheriffs Office!
in 2018 displaying respect for the flag or the president is enough to get you purged from the democratic party. sad but true. vanblarcum will lose this primary but win the general.
Pathetic that Van Blarcum thinks Ulster Democrats are idiots. He dropped thousands of mailers this weekend to falsely suggest that HE was the endorsed candidate. His campaign is funded and run by Republicans, and demonstrates the lack of ethics to prove it.