U.N. accomplices
The slides and talk, pitting ideas against each other, continued. What was the opposite of regionalism? Home rule (“Once we okay something like this we lose our choice, our freedom.”) The inverse of individual rights? Collective communities.
“I’m not making any of this up,” she started repeating as she targeted planning groups, showing their relationships to national and international professional organizations which she then labeled as United Nations NGOs (Non-Governmental Organizations). Open-space initiatives were about protecting wildlife by taking property from humans. Bike trails could cost upwards of $500,000 per mile in many places.
“They want us to bike or walk as an alternative means of getting to work, that’s an alternative to single vehicle automobile travel,” she said. “They talk about ‘appealing to all levels of income.’ You turn my single-family neighborhood into a flexible housing neighborhood, you could get anything. It changes the dynamic of where I live!”
Teger pointed out how federal agencies and NGOs were all UN accomplices. She brought up how former Saugerties town supervisor Greg Helsmoortel had been named to the regional Greenway council after losing his office in an election. She targeted the Sierra Club and Nature Conservancy alongside the federal Department of Transportation, the EPA and AARP.
“They keep changing words to hide what they are doing,” she added. “They’re trying to train people, and students in college, to tell us that we don’t know what we’re talking about, that we’re crazy.”
As her presentation sped into its second hour, Teger brought up the subject of “smart meters” gauging one’s electrical and heating use. She read off cards that listed how the UN Agenda 21 was working “to pulverize our roads, restrict our energy and water use, and sink our economy by draining our tax dollars.”
People started standing up, suggesting ways in which people can tell their meter readers to go to hell and get off their property. Someone quipped that Ben Bernanke behind everything. A flurry of heads nodded. Obamacare got mentioned. So did efforts to fund rural development.
“They’re using the environment to push a political agenda,” Teger said, bringing up the idea of the Hegelian dialectic as “something they use in Communist countries to produce an agenda.”
Lynn, you are doing an outstanding job and performing an invaluable service to property owners and Americans.Keep up the work and feel free to contact me if I can be of any help.
It was refreshing to see Lynn Teger come to Saugerties to give us a highly informed presentation on what to expect from UN agenda 21, ICLEI. It has opened up the eyes of many residents to its evil tentacles that comes under a guise of “its good for you”, “how wonderful” and it will “benefit the community”, its for “your protection”, “security”. Many showed up for this presentation to receive answers on why they are being taxed out, programed out of their homes. It is economic and environmental warfare. We must hold those that sit on committees and that have signed the ICLEI document accountable. Thank you Lynn Teger for your professional and patriotic concerns. The article is misleading because this presentation was not affiliated with any party, tea, democratic or republican. It was a professional and citizen stepping up where others would just turn a blind eye too. REALITY!
The title of this article should have been, Drinking the Realitea. I live in California and everything Lynn Teger spoke about as reported in this article is accurate. To learn about what is going on in California read through my blog exurbia chronicles via these two articles
The American Smart Dream part 1, http://www.exurbiachronicles.com/?page_id=640
The American Smart Dream part 2, http://www.exurbiachronicles.com/?page_id=642
Also download Dimensions of Sustainability PDF Report to learn about how to to present the facts about sustainable development to your elected officials.
The fact that Mr. Smart reported on this issue, is a step in the right direction, even though the article tries to minimize and distort many things I stated at the presentation. When you don’t like the message, kill the messenger. Fact: Sustainable development and United Nations Agenda 21 exists and is a threat to the sovereignty of our nation, our freedoms and our property rights. It is a violation of both the 10th and 5th amendment the United States Constitution.
The history behind UN Agenda 21 and sustainable development is undeniable and is affecting every American citizen, whether they are aware of it or not.
Mr. Smart refuses to acknowledge the history, the facts and the truth and has injected his own personal views into the article without doing the research I suggested everyone do when I gave the presentation. Had Mr. Smart done the research, he would have clearly been able to see how UN Agenda 21 and Sustainable Development is affecting American citizens in every city and State across the country.
Thank you to all those who attended the presentation. I hope it provided you with the tools you will need going forward.
Local government urging people to think about more than just themselves and their own property and increasing their own income and equity is not evidence of a massive conspiracy. But in a time in which the American acceptance of the reality of the overwhelming scientific conclusion of man-made climate change is actually decreasing (even as we are to get walloped by an unprecedented bizarre weather event), I am not surprised at the Agenda 21 crowd. They shouldn’t be laughed at though, but they should be rebutted on a point-by-point basis.
Or not. These are all the same people that oppose tax breaks for developments and vote down school budgets. They’re just sick of property taxes. Shift a greater share public funding of education to the state and raise consumption taxes – anything but asking people to fork over several thousands of dollars every September – and all this would go away.
UN Agenda 21 is very real and is an effort to slowly eliminate our property rights.
The sad thing is that our taxes fund all of this “government growth”.
Thank you Lynn Teger for taking the time to share this information.